No.. Its was a bad call by Jerry Buss, he panicked when they failed to win a championship 2 yrs in a row evn by acquiring Malone and Payton,thinking Shaq and Kobes 3peat might rot , he chose to make the lakers self destruct..Thus sendng shaq to the heat and rebuilding around kobe.. But putting a Brown experiment and a soft girl like Odom alongside Kobe will never do.
The result? lakers are now just another NBA team..
Do you think it was good that the Lakers traded Shaq?nba power rankings
IMHO--yes
Do you think it was good that the Lakers traded Shaq?nba ballers ,nba teams
No. Shaq may not score the most points on Heat team but I don't think they would have gotten as far as they have w/o him. Most might think Dwyane would have gotten his team there even if Shaq wasn't on the team, but Dwyane is only one person and it takes a team to win. Don't get me wrong I'm not hatin' on Dwyane b/c that's my favorite NBA player, but the Heat also need SHAQ!!!
no they should have kepted shaq
of course! He needed to get away from Kobe and his "business".
lol Yeah...for Miami Heat :)
It was good for the Heat
Not really.
NOT FOR LAKERS BUT GREAT FOR THE HEAT
No if Shaq stayed they would have won more championships.
no but they had do
No. Because when Shaq was in LA with Kobe, the ESPN propaganda machine dictated that LA should beat Sacramento even when Sacramento was a better team just like they are doing now with Miami over Dallas.
But maybe Kobe will come to peace with the ESPN propaganda machine and be chosen back into the "elite" club that receives preferential treatment and LA will return to winning again!
no way
No, it was definately not a good idea to trade Shaq, they need him to win another championship
I suppose not. Kobe and Shaq could no longer co-exist though. One of them had to go or neither of them would play.
No without shaq their useless they need a big guy down low.
noooo they need shaq shaq and kobe ?
No. Shaq was the real number 1 man in LA. No matter how Kobe spun it off.
idk
No comments:
Post a Comment